BA long-haul – where to next & with what? Winter 2015/16+
Back to Forum- This topic has 644 replies, 82 voices, and was last updated 9 Jul 2016
at 13:36 by onajetplane.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
sparkyflierParticipantI am sure you are right RF re incentives, but I hope they do not ignore other major opportunities…
Re Tehran, LH are moving from A340-600 to 744, so surely an A321 would be a rather puny offering, in that demand would justify a larger aircraft? Iran Air after all currently use A300-600.
20 Oct 2015
at 21:21
PeterCoultasParticipantI thought BMI flew to Tehran prior to BA’s engulfing them? Maybe better if BMI had taken over BA???
20 Oct 2015
at 21:27
sparkyflierParticipantI think you are right PeterCoultas, but that may have been just before the sanctions on Iran were increased. Also I do not think the flight was non-stop, but stopped in somewhere on the way.
I wonder if the LH crew actually overnight in Tehran, or return on the same plane as PAX – I have no idea of the crew rest issues.
But this route could stop in maybe Yerevan, or how about this for enhancing regional relations… Tel Aviv 🙂
20 Oct 2015
at 21:48
AMcWhirterParticipantIf BA doesn’t act soon it will be left behind.
* Lufthansa is starting flights from Munich to Tehran.*
x3 weekly non-stop services by A330-300 are starting on April 28 next year.
20 Oct 2015
at 23:18
AisleSeatTravellerParticipantagree that BA needs a mainland Chinese partner to serve the obscure but rapidly growing secondary and tertiary regional cities
Tehran is a must, perhaps delay the retirement of a couple of 747s to operate the route (also not sure on the crew procedures or slot availability, it would be 7+ hours from LHR)
21 Oct 2015
at 00:03
AisleSeatTravellerParticipantagree that BA needs a mainland Chinese partner to serve the obscure but rapidly growing secondary and tertiary regional cities
Tehran is a must, perhaps delay the retirement of a couple of 747s to operate the route (also not sure on the crew procedures or slot availability, it would be 7+ hours from LHR)
21 Oct 2015
at 00:03
sparkyflierParticipantI think a 777-220 would be a reasonable way to start,Tehran maybe 4 x weekly.
re China I think an agreement with China Southern (major Skyteam player…) would be ideal, and using Urumqi as a western hub, where China Southern has a major network.
I hope they have not forgotten West Africa in their plans. Freetown and Monrovia did perform after all before Ebola, and such a recommenced route would really help their economies. Dakar and Abidjan could be ideal combinations for these routes.
21 Oct 2015
at 08:10
AMcWhirterParticipantNobody expected this.
http://www.businesstraveller.com/news/102172/ba-to-reopen-gatwick-jfk-route
21 Oct 2015
at 10:51
sparkyflierParticipantI just tried to make a comment on this but the site froze and then gobbled my incomplete comment!
I think it will work this time around and the schedules are attractive. |It makes good use of the 772 aircraft between their Lima and San Jose rotations.
I wonder also if there is market for an ORD-LGW route, either by AA or BA, to feed into BA’s Gatwick network..
21 Oct 2015
at 10:57
TimFitzgeraldTCParticipantDon’t know if already known / announced but they are dropping the Gatwick – Vegas route from April 16 so only LHR to LAS. Flights still on GDS but I guess this aircraft will switch to JFK with rejigging of utilization with San Jose / Lima flights.
21 Oct 2015
at 12:07
AndrewinHKParticipant@james72 LAS is just being transferred to LHR it will be 11 weekly now all 747. I wonder if a JFK flight going to Gatwick will mean a reduction of frequency by BA at Heathrow. AA just announced a new JFK frequency so maybe BA will use a JFK slot to serve somewhere else. If not it’s quite a considerable capacity increase on an already congested route. I understand the Gatwick move, transfer traffic from aer Lingus, and BA itself will fill seats, but also it is to pressure Norwegian from gaining market share.
21 Oct 2015
at 15:23
AndrewinHKParticipantBA has a transatlantic market share to protect, Norweigan do fly from Gatwick to JFK and this move by BA must have been partly due to that. BA Strategy at Gatwick seems to be to lower capex, maybe that’s the only way they can make it work. Instead of ordering new aircraft they bought second hand a320’s to base there. The 777’s haven’t been refurbished and they really need to be. New York is a good return and hopefully a positive sign for the future.
21 Oct 2015
at 15:48
AndrewinHKParticipantConfirmed BA will reduce frequency to JFK from LHR. Transferring one of there own daily frequencies to AA, overall BA aircraft at JFK will remain the same with the new LGW service. 8 daily LHR-JFK down from 9 daily. 7 operated with 747, 1 with 777.
28 Oct 2015
at 13:50 -
AuthorPosts