Heathrow T3 woes
Back to Forum- This topic has 46 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 22 Dec 2011
at 12:09 by canucklad.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
HedgeFundFlyerParticipantHeathrow geeks could do a lot worse than take a look at the capital investment plan for the airport.
Link to BAA investor site is as follows:
http://www.baa.com/assets/Internet/BAA%20Airports/Downloads/Static%20files/Heathrow_CIP2011_Full.pdf
20 Dec 2011
at 10:03
LeTigreParticipantRichHI1, I have good reasons for not minding T3 most of the time, but like everyone else I do hate the immigration, but I like:
-the funky VA check-in
-the modern A380 gates
-the (generally) nice biz lounges
-that you can generally buy whatever you want, even if it is a bit pricey
-the little outdoor concourse, to get a bit of fresh airI obviously don’t like:
-general messy layout
-few plane views
-crowded departure halls
-poor connectivity to other terminals
-awful peak-time security arrangements20 Dec 2011
at 10:21
VintageKrugParticipantT3 is fine if you check in at a premium desk, use Fast Track security and head straight to one of the premium lounges (Virgin, BA or Cathay) and board through one of the new A380 gates.
Otherwise, the experience for the masses is decidedly sub-par. Thankfully, I’m not one of the masses, but can understand their justified frustration.
Virgin premium customers are entirely isolated from the melee so they really aren’t impacted by the chaos in the main terminal.
20 Dec 2011
at 13:47
VintageKrugParticipantAnd you haven’t said how you know VA will move into Heathrow East in 2014.
20 Dec 2011
at 14:00
LeTigreParticipantHere’s one example:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4424554.stm
Also, there have been many BAA documents with that on, but I am too busy to spend time searching.
Anyway, I was asking for **your** source, not mine.
20 Dec 2011
at 14:58
DisgustedofSwieqiParticipant“Not naming names but there is hyperbole, there is BA BS and there is …”
The Cairo Motor Yacht Club, always in ‘de nile.’ 😉
20 Dec 2011
at 15:59
BucksnetParticipant“BAA said the proposed new terminal ……… would be used by airlines including Virgin ………..”
I can’t see Virgin surviving outside an alliance, and will still struggle if they join one. Oneworld is out, SkyTeam is unlikely, so probably Star. If they join SkyTeam they need to move to T4, otherwise they should move to T2 with all the other Star carriers.
20 Dec 2011
at 16:11
VintageKrugParticipantHow much do you reckon it costs an airline to move terminals at LHR?
20 Dec 2011
at 16:20
RichHI1ParticipantI would be interested to know. I guess if you do it smoothly it is a lot less than if you screw it up. I suspect the move to T5 was very expensive but maybe LH or UA to T1 was probably cheaper (even allowing for smaller sizes). I suspect ancilliary costs would be less too as HEX would only be rerouted for BA.
20 Dec 2011
at 19:18
DisgustedofSwieqiParticipant“How much do you reckon it costs an airline to move terminals at LHR?”
GBP 3,410,202.43p.
20 Dec 2011
at 20:46
LeTigreParticipantVirgin has a relatively small operation at Heathrow, as you can see by the measly 3% of slots, while moving things around must cost a bit, but really a one-off relocation shouldn’t have lots of costs involved. I assume BAA will fork out for outfitting the terminals so the cost really can’t be that huge.
20 Dec 2011
at 22:08 -
AuthorPosts