Chatting through the safety demonstration
Back to Forum- This topic has 191 replies, 50 voices, and was last updated 7 Oct 2013
at 00:24 by MartynSinclair.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
StephenPParticipantA bit OT, but a couple of months ago I was in an aisle seat in an emergency exit row on an IcelandAir flight. The flight attendant came and spoke to us, telling us we were in an emergency exit row and asking us to read the safety card. I did so but the two ladies next to me did not. I don’t know if it was standard procedure, or if the FA noticed, but a few minutes later the FA reappeared and asked the ladies to show her how they would open the emergency exit if instructed to do so. They of course didn’t know, and after that they read the card. It was all handled expertly and politely by the FA.
I would bet that a good proportion of passengers couldn’t adopt the brace position correctly if asked to do so, or couldn’t tell you how many rows it is to their nearest exit.
Regarding the nearest exit – I often wonder why they don’t have a little sign on the seat back in front of you to the effect of “your nearest exit is X rows in front of you and Y rows behind you” – instead of relying on passengers to count them for themselves (which can be difficult during boarding when it’s behind you).
9 Aug 2013
at 10:46
BigDog.ParticipantStephen,
The clip from the 48 minute point on this BBC “Science Program” would indicate that in a “panic” situation we take on a swarm or crowd mentality rendering signage of little benefit.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b037mln3/Dara_O_Briains_Science_Club_Series_2_Mindbending/
This phenomenon has been evidenced by evacutions which show very few pax opted for the rear exit despite being far closer and fully functioning.
9 Aug 2013
at 11:00
SergeantMajorParticipantIn the UK, the safety announcements almost always mention “take a moment to identify your nearest exit, which may be behind you”.
I believe that statement was added after one of the big crashes in the UK (Kegworth or Manchester?) where people piled up by the forward exit, while the rear remained underused.
Interestingly, after Kegworth, recommendations were made to encourage rear-facing seats, similar to some Club World seats, which are believed to be safer in most impacts:
“Professor Angus Walace of the Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham said: “We discovered a lot of those on board had not adopted a brace position for the impact.
“There were many fractures where people’s legs flailed under the seat infront, and of course arm and head injuries as they shot forward.
“I’m pleased to say the CAA and British airlines have now adopted our recommended brace position with you head forward by your knees, your hands over your head, and your feet firmly planted behind your knees so they can’t shoot forward.”
But Prof Wallace would like to see further safety measures – including rear-facing seats in all aircraft, a possibility that has been considered and rejected by different airlines, and not purely, they say, for reasons of cost. “
9 Aug 2013
at 11:44
AnthonyDunnParticipant@ SergeantMajor – 09/08/2013 11:44 GMT
Those of us who have had the pleasure of flying call-sign Ascot (aka Royal Air Force) in days gone by will recall that everyone was indeed seated facing backwards. For some reason, the rational for which I know not, this changed with the L1011 Tristars.
9 Aug 2013
at 17:47
SergeantMajorParticipantWere/are there other commercial airliners which have/had rear-facing seats?
I’m certain I once saw some in an aviation museum, but can’t recall which one or the aircraft type.
14 Aug 2013
at 11:25
DavidGordon10ParticipantCzech airlines ATRs also had a rear-facing row. Nice seat to sit and have a sociable chat to other passengers and the flight attendant
14 Aug 2013
at 12:29
MartynSinclairParticipantI remember travelling to Paris with my parents and brother on a BEA Trident and being allocated a rear facing seat with a table between – that would be around 1968….
14 Aug 2013
at 12:32
IanFromHKGParticipantUA have rear-facing seats in business
http://blog.sfgate.com/cmcginnis/2012/01/19/a-look-inside-uniteds-newly-configured-boeing-777-2/14 Aug 2013
at 15:58
highspeed1ParticipantDon’t agree with chatting through the safety briefing, but there is a flip side. BA has not materially changed its safety briefing video in at least 10 years. That is so boring for frequent flyers and it is unsurprising that they adopt inappropriate behaviours. If airlines want to keep passengers’ attention they need to stop boring people and keep the message fresh. I travelled with QF on domestic flights in July and noted that the safety briefing was different and much more punchy than the one used in 2010. It now uses employees from across the airline to deliver the message and it is punchy and grips attention. However, they will need to change it again in the next year or two to retain its freshness and interest people. BA could learn a trick or two from their competitors.
15 Aug 2013
at 20:20
MartynSinclairParticipantIn light of recent experiences, perhaps airline safety briefings need to be modified to emphasise
BAGS SHOULD BE LEFT ON BOARD in event of an evacuation
CELLPHONE PICTURES/VIDEOS should not be taken on take off or landing as phones are meant to be off anyway
In order to gain attention the safety briefing needs to be fresh and interesting. I may life my head to look and listen – but I agree with highspeed1’s view, the briefing needs to be fresh 2013.
Why is there still a mention of no smoking, surely people know this by now…. (except of course on Egypt Air)….
16 Aug 2013
at 12:04
donkeyasiaParticipantLast night on DL 283, (21st) TYO-BKK, the safety announcement came on and asked everyone to look at their screen. i opened mine and was immediately called to task by an attendant of my mothers age (i am 67), who quite aggressively slammed it shut. i asked how i could see what was going on and she told me to go back to economy and look at the main screen. I gave up.
As an aside, she was so short she had to ask a passenger to close the overhead locker.
22 Aug 2013
at 13:02 -
AuthorPosts