LHR Capacity
Back to Forum- This topic has 99 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 20 Jun 2012
at 15:00 by tolotaxi.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
tolotaxiParticipantThanks CX that’s what I was getting at. Rich, its not communism, its called increased efficiency, passengers and income for Britain. If UA operated two 777’s to EWR daily then they could give the other slots to say TAM for routes to South America or Asiana for Soeul or Daegu.
18 Jun 2012
at 16:13
Tete_de_cuveeParticipantBoris backing a second runway at Stanstead as an interim measure as the LHR solution in not on the horizon….
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/aviation/9339749/Boris-Johnson-backs-new-runway-at-Stansted.html
18 Jun 2012
at 20:51
LeTigreParticipantOh brilliant, the one airport in the country that wouldn’t actually use it!
Exactly how many passengers have they lost at Stansted in the last 3-4 years?!
-The catchment is not very affluent
-The transport links are average, not as good as Gatwick
-Ryanair virtually runs the place
-Passenger numbers ebb and flow at Mr o’Lary’s every whim18 Jun 2012
at 21:11
BucksnetParticipantStansted catchment not very affluent? Many years ago Ryanair conducted a study which found that the average income of a Stansted passenger was around £43,000. That was then and should be higher now, but even if it’s not, the average UK wage is around £26,000.
18 Jun 2012
at 22:04
Tete_de_cuveeParticipantThe FT reports….
New software for LHR is being installed which enables real time data to be shared between BAA, airlines, baggage handling and air trafic control. The objective is to improve punctuality, cost saving and capacity especially during the Olympics
BAA”s head of airside activities at Heathrow, Tim Hardy, .. ” the technology would mean that aircraft should spend less time on taxiways waiting for take-off, cutting airlines” aggregate fuel bills by £10m a year and reducing annual carbon emissions at Heathrow by 30,000 tonnes.
19 Jun 2012
at 11:02
RichHI1ParticipantSo Tolotaxi, why not insist That BA and othe carriers use 747 and 773 or 380 on all popular european routes? If CDG, BRU, AMS, FRA, MXP, FCO, MAD, BCN, CPH, MUC, ZRH, GVA, VIE were reduced to 1 or 2 747’s a day then there would be many free slots available. Presumably one would also only allow slots where over 90% of seats are sold. Those not achieving this Over say a monthly window ocould be cancelled and allocated to other carriers on a standby basis?
20 Jun 2012
at 00:55 -
AuthorPosts