Who is UK’s Flag Carrier ?
Back to Forum- This topic has 39 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 15 Feb 2010
at 12:24 by Hess963.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
GoonerLondonParticipantSingapore is a member of the commonwealth…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republics_in_the_Commonwealth_of_Nations
14 Feb 2010
at 22:37
GoonerLondonParticipantI think the term ‘flag carrier’ is more about an airline being ‘sponsored’ to fly to destinations by the government, which is an effect, a subsidy.
I also think this has been expanded over the years to include ‘vanity routes’ – so airlines can keep pins on maps
Of course this has all been blown out the water in recent years. Some airlines still seem to like a bit of vanity flying (e.g. certain airlines flying to African destinations) but the majority are pretty focused on every route paying its way.
Moreover, which government is prepared to pay taxpayer’s money to keep airlines flying to routes (save those counties with long-haul out-islands)?
So I think this is a redundant term – before we even think about applying it to a UK based carrier.
(Even though I was tempted to post based on the implied ‘which carrier best exports British values…’)
14 Feb 2010
at 22:46
continentalclubParticipantI think, in all fairness, the most prevalent understanding of what constitutes a Commonwealth ‘member’ is actually a so-called Commonwealth Realm, of which neither Singapore nor Hong Kong is.
The point is somewhat moot however, as there is no practical or economic rationale whatsoever for any other carrier to be used other than a UK-based one, with whom the Royal Household, Special Branch and other relevant agencies already have pre-existing relationships.
14 Feb 2010
at 22:47
GoonerLondonParticipantWell Singapore was a colony – but we’re talking about the Commonwealth of Nations, a membership which includes those who have never been a British colony. Mozambique for one!
I think what you are getting at is not which countries were colonies – but which have retained The Queen as head of state. This is a smaller group and includes Australia, New Zealand, Canada, The Bahamas, and a number of Caribbean Nations.
You then have a number of nations that became republics that are in the commonwealth which is much larger (India, most of the African members etc.)
And then you have republics that chose not to be part of the commonwealth such as Ireland and…um….the ….USA !! Both are eligible though!
So why shouldn’t HM fly an airline of a country in which she is Head of State?
14 Feb 2010
at 22:52
VintageKrugParticipantWhen travelling, there is nothing like stepping out of the fierce heat in some Third World hellhole into a cool BA plane and being greeted by a British Airways crewmember.
The kettle will be on shortly, and it feels like you are home already.
15 Feb 2010
at 11:15
ConstantFlyerParticipantVintageKrug – Not sure that BA flies to many “Third World hell holes” any more – apart from Heathrow, of course!
15 Feb 2010
at 11:43 -
AuthorPosts