Nov 30 strike, comment by Border staff
Back to Forum- This topic has 16 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 1 Dec 2011
at 13:57 by RichHI1.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
Charles-PParticipantI spoke to the UK Border Service office this morning as I’m coming through Heathrow on Wednesday.
The person I spoke to was confident there would be minimal delays as most staff are expected to turn up as usual plus a number of managers have been trained to fill the gaps. He said they expect less than 20% of staff to strike.
28 Nov 2011
at 12:28
Binman62ParticipantI work closely with elements of the public sector and can tell you that I am seeing 80% plus staff on strike in all areas of public service for Wednesday. 20% at UKBA sounds hopelessly optimistic and in contrast to the mood music of 12 hour delays (Exaggerated) and the offer by BA and VS to change flights without penalty. EY have now also cancelled several services to LHR that day. My own experience of UKBA last Sunday in T3 suggest a demoralised and bitter workforce up for a fight…be it government or lippy passenger.
28 Nov 2011
at 16:19
Charles-PParticipantBinman62 – I am sure you are right with some parts of the public sector. Teachers for example are supporting it in that percentage however I was relaying what I was told. I do remember the last Border Agency strike was poorly supported as well with no real disruption.
28 Nov 2011
at 17:01
VintageKrugParticipantCrucial word missed out:
LABOUR MP called for LHR to be closed during strike
28 Nov 2011
at 23:12
VintageKrugParticipantBBC reporting the border experience is “smoother than usual”.
30 Nov 2011
at 10:07
BeckyBoopParticipantES says things are running as normal at london airports …yay!!! 🙂
xx30 Nov 2011
at 10:22
RichHI1ParticipantI am confused again by the British media. I flew in late 29th and had excellent IRIS and customs service and from what I read here the experience on 30th was very good. In major part down to UKBA measures, in part due to carriers like AA cutting some flights and in part by pax switching dates. So I am thinking “good job BAA and UKBA”. Then I read that Cameron says strike was “damp squib” so am I wrong to congratulate UKBA and BAA? As I struggle to align these positions we have business leaders saying that big losses to industry and government ministers saying it has caused unemployment. So my experience shows airport did professional job, Cameron says nothing happened and business says major damage for which they want compensation… Where does the truth lie?
1 Dec 2011
at 09:28
Binman62ParticipantBottom line load factors down by at least 30% and a number of cancellations from AA and Etihad. Staffing border points with the prime ministers press office staff will have helped but one must wonder how many people got in who perhaps should not.
The contingency plans of the airlines and BAA in my view won the day.
UK PLC probably benefited overall as most strikers, and those forced to take time off to look after kids seem to have gone shopping!.
It is more than a bit rich for this government to claim a single days strike will ruin the country when they themselves gave everyone a day off for very privileged young couples wedding early this year. Did that not do similar damage?
1 Dec 2011
at 09:36 -
AuthorPosts