Basic Economy – we had better get used to it.

Back to Forum
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

  • Anonymous
    Guest

    Charles-P
    Participant

    From This Week’s Economist

    Back in February United and American Airlines announced they were joining Delta Air Lines in introducing“basic economy”, a new class of fare below standard. This doesn’t mean sitting even farther back in the plane, but it removes the few perks that economy passengers still enjoy, chiefly the ability to select one’s seat before checking in (and to ensure that parties traveling together could sit together).

    The early reviews were universally negative—except for the only one that counts. Because basic economy, it seems, is quite profitable for the airlines. Delta, which introduced basic economy on a limited scale in 2012 and announced an expansion last year, has now released a report on its financials. In the first three months of this year, the airline says, basic economy earned Delta an additional $20m in revenue. Delta is planning to expand the fare class beyond the roughly 1,650 routes (8% of the airline’s total routes) it currently serves. Once United and American introduce it later this year, it’ll become a relatively standard feature of flying on US carriers.

    That news is likely to be met with further groans from flyers, who have complained that the last remaining pleasures of air travel are being slowly stripped away. And yet it’s what flyers are voting for—if not with their voices, then with their wallets. In a recent survey conducted by an airline-industry group, passengers urged airlines to provide more legroom and comfort. But they also revealed that they make their flying decisions based on price above all other factors. In other words, what they say they want isn’t what they’re actually willing to pay for.

    The introduction of basic economy could be greeted as part of a trend of good news for flyers: traveling by air is getting cheaper. The average US fare is now at its lowest level since 2010. Much of that can be attributed to lower fuel prices. But for cash-strapped travelers, the ability to pay a slightly lower price in exchange for sacrificing a few privileges can be the difference between flying and not flying. For an industry trying to expand its customer base, and for some of those customers themselves, that’s surely a welcome development.

    “If you’re shopping for just solely price, we want to have a product that can compete effectively and provide the best services against carriers who are providing a much lower quality of service” Delta’s chief revenue officer, Glen Hauenstein, recently told analysts, according to the Los Angeles Times—a dig at the low-cost airlines, such as Spirit and Frontier, against which basic economy is intended to compete.

    For many other flyers, however, the arrival of basic economy represents yet one more area in which they’re given an unwelcome choice: pay extra or be subjugated to further indignities. Like it or not, they’d better get used to it.


    SimonS1
    Participant

    From this week’s Economist.

    Human nature is funny isn’t it. Everyone moans like crazy but price always speaks loudly. I suppose Ryanair is the classic example, universally panned but carrying almost 110m people a year, growing 10%pa, 93% load factors and the most profitable airline in Europe.

    For many people it ticks the boxes.


    PeterCoultas
    Participant

    My last UA return to the US was a combination of “normal” and “premium” economies…..if there is to be a lower quality (though cheaper) version I’ll consider flying to the USA via asia instead !!!!

    pathetic service and comfort, no decent stop overs (other than iceland), minimal FF & status points – maybe ok on the outbound (like BA short haul) but a totally miserable inbound experience


    AMcWhirter
    Participant

    We reported on basic economy class in March.

    What is not mentioned in the above article is the intention by United to join the “10-across club” when it reconfigures some of its B777s. Of course, as we have already reported, American is now a member.

    http://www.businesstraveller.com/news/us-airlines-poised-for-economy-downgrade


    LuganoPirate
    Participant

    Not sure where you start your journey’s from Peter, but you don’t need to go via Asia. Emirates have a service from Milan direct to the US – though I’ve no idea how Economy is.


    AMcWhirter
    Participant

    LP – Emirates uses an A380 on this route. And economy class on the A380 is some of the best around at the present time.

    The Milan Malpensia-New York JFK route is operated on a fifth freedom basis. Emirates secured the rights despite much opposition from the government in Rome.


    LuganoPirate
    Participant

    Thanks Alex. I’ve yet to fly it though I likely will in November. My fellow board members have done MXP-JFK and tell me it’s superb, with business comparable to Swiss first. They will also send a car to Lugano to collect me and bring me back. Very tempting.


    FDOS_UK
    Participant

    “LP – Emirates uses an A380 on this route. And economy class on the A380 is some of the best around at the present time.”

    It is very pleasant for a 7 hour day flight, 32-34″ of pitch, nice wide seat and if you can get upstairs (on the 2 class a/c) it’s even better, as it’s 2-4-2 across.

    And the IFE sets the standard for the rest, plus the F&B is a benchmark for eco.


    FDOS_UK
    Participant

    Back on topic, BA Y – without status (and LH, AF, even with status) is pretty much ‘basic eco’.

    No seat selection, you get what’s left at checkin.

    BA HBO is definitely basic Y. Seat 25A/B on the A319 (143 seats) has no window and is opposite the bogs – lovely jubbly. A GGL could get one of these on a HBO fare – insanity.

    Now Ryanair is different; the CVP (customer value proposition) is cheap price, punctual, but no frills – very low customer expectations; You can add what you want, exit or upfront seat, priority boarding.

    I have very mixed feelings about Ryanair, I don’t like the way they treat some staff, but as a strategist, I recognise they have a very clear view of what business they are in, who their customers are and how to service them – really case study suff.

    The difference between Ryanair and the legacies, is that Ryanair were the disruptive innovators, who learned how to deliver an acceptable product (to those who buy it) at a cost that the legacies can only dream of; in response, the legacies responses are negative and ultimately will fail.


    Cedric_Statherby
    Participant

    What is puzzling is why air travel is – almost uniquely – so subject to this race to the bottom. In no other service industry is price quite such a dominant element of customer decision making.

    When we eat out, we don’t all gravitate to the cheapest greasy spoon or fast food outlet. When we buy cars we don’t all hunt out the cheapest rubbish car from a probably unsafe manufacturer. When we buy a mobile phone we are happy to pay for extras – often eye-wateringly. We don’t all wear rags, drink exclusively tap water and so on.

    So why, when we are buying air travel – which for most people is usually part of a holiday and so meant to be a treat, having fun, enjoyable etc – does saving a few pounds so completely dominate the decision making process?

    Can anyone explain?

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
The cover of the Business Traveller April 2024 edition
The cover of the Business Traveller April 2024 edition
Be up-to-date
Magazine Subscription
To see our latest subscription offers for Business Traveller editions worldwide, click on the Subscribe & Save link below
Polls