Singapore – BA vs Cathay
Back to Forum- This topic has 27 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 12 Feb 2018
at 02:13 by K1ngston.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
nmtravellerParticipantHello,
Planning a trip to Singapore. For roughly the same price I have the choice between:
– Cathay Pacific in business both ways – never flown with them. one stop but overall duration not bad and flight times convenient.
– BA with First one way and return in PE – never been in the Concorde room, never tried the A380, direct flights always more convenient of course.What do you guys think? I could also do BA business both ways but I just don’t like Club World (personal preference).
Thanks for your suggestions.
22 Jan 2018
at 11:01
CathayLoyalist2ParticipantIn my unbiased and humble opinion Cathay every time. CX´s business class layout 1-2-1 trumps ( “it will be great”) BA with the awful 8 across and as the return sector is long you will appreciate Business Class. The stopover in HKG will afford you the opportunity to visit either The Wing or The Pier First Class Lounges if you have the status otherwise the Business Class lounges are good.
22 Jan 2018
at 11:51
cotswoldswParticipantMy vote would be CX. J isn’t far off BA F although the catering won’t be as good. The CX seat is great and whilst I definitely prefer the A380 to the 777, a bed for the long flight home surely trumps WT+.
I like the Concorde Room but the new lounges in T3 are fantastic, especially if you’re OW Emerald.
Finally, if time isn’t such an issue, you’ll earn more tier points/miles.22 Jan 2018
at 12:13
nmtravellerParticipantThanks all. Interesting to see such an overwhelming vote in favour of CX! While I wasn’t expecting votes in favour of BA CW I thought First would fare a bit better vs. CX J…
22 Jan 2018
at 12:29
MartynSinclairParticipantWhilst I am highly critical (as most people are) about the BA CW product, as long as I am upstairs on the 380 by the window (with far more space) I manage 7 – 8 hours sleep to Asia. I will avoid the 777 like the plague.. the window seat feels very cramped…
Don’t be taken in by the Concorde lounge.. as part of your decision though, I don’t find it anything overly special.
Personally, i would take the BA flight to SIN via HKG… the lounges in HKG are certainly worth a visit…
Let us know your decision, also would be interested to hear the price being paid..
22 Jan 2018
at 13:30
nmtravellerParticipantThe price is roughly the same for both options at around £2,200. However I got a bit carried away with the CX flight times. The website says “from £2,200” but in reality the flight with convenient times are in excess of £4,000. In order to get the cheap price, I would need to add 4.5 hours journey time each way compared to the BA direct option.
22 Jan 2018
at 13:41
AlanOrton1ParticipantIt also depends on how much you value your time at home, with loved ones etc.
If I was offered BA CW (as Martyn says, take a window seat upstairs) both ways at the same price as CX J with a layover of any length in HK, I would definitely opt for the former. (I’d try to do this as the downside of WTP is greater than an uplift to F, in my mind).
My reasons being I like to limit the amount of time away from home when I travel and adding a significant number of hours isn’t something that works for me.
Also, there is less chance of delays as if a connecting flight goes tech, you could be stuck an additional period of time waiting for the next available optionThe last one happened to me a couple of years back when I was on a multi leg route through Asia and CX offered a good fare as well as an internal flight as part of the package. It meant I had to fly home SIN – HKG – LHR. Unfortunately the SIN-HKG leg went tech (a morning flight) and so there was no way I was going to make the last afternoon flight CX operate to LHR. Result was I was put in a day room at Changi from around 11am until the BA A380 flight, which they booked me onto, left at circa 11pm that evening. CX handled it well, but does highlight issues can happen with connecting flights etc.
22 Jan 2018
at 14:02
canuckladParticipantI’ve never had the privilege to fly BA in “F”, but from comments made on here from those who have I get the impression that it should be re-designated as “PJ” similar to the relationship between “Y” and “PE”
And although BA’s cabin crew are excellent when they get it right, all too often you’ll see comments about inconsistency and occasionally rubbish in-flight service.
Rarely if ever do you see negative remarks about Cathays cabin crew.
And if you’ve never been to HK, you could possibly arrange a longer transfer time to allow you a short visit to the city, which is incredibly easy to access from Chep Lap Kok
22 Jan 2018
at 16:38
FDOS_UKParticipant[quote quote=847571]I’ve never had the privilege to fly BA in “F”, but from comments made on here from those who have I get the impression that it should be re-designated as “PJ” similar to the relationship between “Y” and “PE”[/quote]
To be fair to BA F, the seat is comfortable and much better than CW, but I think that BA no longer really have the know how or facilities to consistently provide a proper F class experience.
I agree with Martyn Sinclair about the Concorde Room, it’s not that it’s a bad lounge, just not what one associates with a proper F lounge.
22 Jan 2018
at 17:38
FDOS_UKParticipant[quote quote=847543]
If I was offered BA CW (as Martyn says, take a window seat upstairs) both ways at the same price as CX J with a layover of any length in HK, I would definitely opt for the former. (I’d try to do this as the downside of WTP is greater than an uplift to F, in my mind).
[/quote]Good points, Alan, it does depend on one’s valuation of time (and also the hassle of connecting).
22 Jan 2018
at 17:40 -
AuthorPosts