Major engine failure involving AF A380 CDG-LAX today
Back to Forum- This topic has 41 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 6 Dec 2017
at 17:10 by AMcWhirter.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
BA789ParticipantHi All,
I have been following this incident on Twitter thanks to a few passengers on the flight.
Take a look, I’m sure most of you will find the updates interesting.
The first and business class passengers were transferred to a chartered 737 that will make it’s way to Los Angeles via Winnipeg, ‘the rest’ have been flown to Atlanta and then on to Los Angeles.
https://mobile.twitter.com/johnnybirk
https://mobile.twitter.com/PJAdams10
Great work by the pilots for getting the plane down safely!
1 Oct 2017
at 15:57
LuganoPirateParticipantI thought that’s what would happen BA789. Must have been really miserable for those in Economy though.
Many years ago – late 70’s and pre Shengen, I was flying Mxp to AMS when for a reason I can no longer recall, we were diverted to Brussels. Living in Rotterdam I thought it would be quicker (after being stuck on board for over an hour) to rent a car and drive home. Talking amongst us we were about 10 all living in Rotterdam, and asked permission to get off. This was refused. So we decided to get off anyway. Down the stairs and halfway to the terminal across an empty tarmac, we were met by gun toting Belgian police who ordered us back. We did not argue!
1 Oct 2017
at 20:38
LuganoPirateParticipantI wonder if they’re entitled to compensation under EU261?
1 Oct 2017
at 20:54
Poshgirl58ParticipantNot wishing to stir this up, but if you think some of the comments above are silly, can I suggest you read the ones on Aviation Herald.
Lack of A380 steps aside, perhaps the Commander made the same decision as the QF32 crew, who also deemed using the chutes to be too dangerous.
1 Oct 2017
at 21:57
FDOS_UKParticipant[quote quote=829297]I wonder if they’re entitled to compensation under EU261?
[/quote]
Tricky. Normally, tech failure is not classed as an extraordinary circumstance, but given this was a major and unusual failure, AF may well claim manufacturing defect, thus an extraordinary circumstance.
I can’t see them paying anything until an investigation has been carried out and a report issued. Of course, I may be wrong.
2 Oct 2017
at 00:38
FDOS_UKParticipant[quote quote=829308]Not wishing to stir this up, but if you think some of the comments above are silly, can I suggest you read the ones on Aviation Herald.
Lack of A380 steps aside, perhaps the Commander made the same decision as the QF32 crew, who also deemed using the chutes to be too dangerous.
[/quote]
Just because some of the Aviation Herald comments border on lunacy does not change the nature of the comments here. 😉
2 Oct 2017
at 00:59
TominScotlandParticipantNot that it changes things much but Goose Bay is both a military and a civilian airfield and does take regular emergency trans-Atlantic landings (presumably as an alternate to Gander and because it has a long runway). There is a small civilian terminal but not large enough for 400+ passengers.
2 Oct 2017
at 05:19
SimonS1Participant[quote quote=829308]Not wishing to stir this up, but if you think some of the comments above are silly, can I suggest you read the ones on Aviation Herald.
Lack of A380 steps aside, perhaps the Commander made the same decision as the QF32 crew, who also deemed using the chutes to be too dangerous.
[/quote]
Of course most sensible people would recognise that. That’s why aircraft commanders are highly trained and I would back their judgement in such situations.
You always get one or two that think they know best though.
From the photos that emerged after the even it appeared that the whole plane was disembarked from a set of steps at 1L.
2 Oct 2017
at 09:13
PeterCoultasParticipantSimonS1..as a retiree I can think that an unnannoucd visit to this base could be interesting and I doubt as unpleasant as being a Catalan voter..would be worth the experience to tool around there….
2 Oct 2017
at 10:30
Alex McWhirterParticipantFor those who are interested I found a video posted many hours ago on twitter by @cypheristikal and taken at Goose Bay.
It’s filmed on the ground as he walks around the A380 during yesterday daytime. You can clearly see the damaged engine and wing.
2 Oct 2017
at 10:41
SimonS1Participant[quote quote=829358]SimonS1..as a retiree I can think that an unnannoucd visit to this base could be interesting and I doubt as unpleasant as being a Catalan voter..would be worth the experience to tool around there….
[/quote]
With a 380 load of passengers suddenly descending on a military base I doubt the security there would really share your interest.
Not to mention the possible bill for repacking the emergency chute set of unncecessarily.
Still you might make the Labrador evening news….hot headed retiree sets off A380 escape chute type stuff.
2 Oct 2017
at 11:34
FlightlevelParticipantMountain out of an A380, lower deck obviously no different to CAF airliner and since no one wanted to be there no security risk either.
Just let them exercise and return to sleep on board ’till hotels found.
A380 is now the safest airliner/pax so must be an AF maintenance problem?2 Oct 2017
at 12:47
Poshgirl58ParticipantIt’s Engine Alliance. Group made up of GE, Pratt & Whitney, SNECMA.
Not RR this time!
2 Oct 2017
at 12:50 -
AuthorPosts