To participate on our forum, please sign in. If you do not have an account, please register.
The best part is where Chris Yates uses the term “somewhat larger people”. Being politically correct or afraid to address the real problem? Yes, people are becoming obese, especially in the Western world.
The real question is: should people of average size be accommodating the obese or do we pay per pound? As every extra pound that has to be lifted costs extra fuel a pay as you go by weight method is fair. And as people of size (as our American cousins eufimistically describe them) take up more space this policy combined with a pay for comfort (read: seat width and seat pitch) method, where not only the comfort of the traveller, but also the comfort of fellow passengers is taken into account, is not only logical, but fair as well.
If we follow this argument, then surely all baggage, stowed or hand, should be charged on a per kilo basis. Then what about wine? I never drink alcohol on board, others do, so I’m paying for them and each bottle weighs about 1.5 kgs so that’s a lot of weight on a 747.
But then isn’t this what some carriers already do, Ryanair springs to mind here!
LP, US airlines on transatlantic and domestic flights already charge for alcohol. When charging on a weight basis I presume everything will be included, person, hold luggage and handluggage.
Low cost airlines already charge for food. IFE in the US has to be paid for.
What else could we think of? The new slogan: Flying is cheap, it’s all the extras you might purchase…..