BA accused of ignoring social distancing and not taking any precautions
Back to Forum- This topic has 30 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 11 May 2020
at 03:06 by K1ngston.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
AMcWhirterParticipantThere have been very many repatriation flights. Few by BA but so many with LH Group carriers … LH mainline has been using A380s to NZ.
There must have been many similar cases.
2 users thanked author for this post.
7 May 2020
at 11:14
MartynSinclairParticipantI am sure an expert in aircraft design and spacing would be able to calculate how many seats would need to be removed to ensure social distancing could be maintained on different aircraft types
My uneducated guess is that the space allocation needed per seat, would be somewhere between business / first (for longhaul) to maintain social distancing on a full flight.
On short haul, even the A318 used for LCY – NYC, I doubt that would be a socially distanced suitable aircraft.
Social distancing on aircraft is impossible to achieve, unless airlines restrict passenger numbers or you fly privately.
Question then of course is, who pays for the extra space.
7 May 2020
at 11:20
ImissConcordeParticipantIt’s an evacuation flight and they were “shocked” by the number of passengers on board. Did any of them volunteer to remove themselves from the aircraft to lessen the crush?
Total of 21 users thanked author for this post. Here are last 20 listed.
7 May 2020
at 11:24
capetonianmParticipantThe FCO is organising repatriation flights through an agency called CTM. I am not sure what airlines they will be using but someone I know is trying to get one from Lagos (happiness is V2 at Murtala Muhamed). The price is £504 (obviously it’s a one way … nobody wants to go back there!).
He’s waiting to know when he can get on and I will pass on his comments on the flight. I think it is bound to be full.
I checked a couple of the few BA scheduled flights operating today, at random. Load factors about 20% so definitely no overcrowding there.
1 user thanked author for this post.
7 May 2020
at 11:27
AMcWhirterParticipantRemember those scenes in 1975 when Saigon was about to be overrun by the Communists … and those US evacuation flights ?
5 users thanked author for this post.
7 May 2020
at 11:31
AMcWhirterParticipantLengthy blog from a BA passenger taking BA repatriation flight from India.
Further in the piece there is a reference to social distancing.
From what the author was saying the flight was full.
But then 200-220 passengers wouldn’t represent a full load. So were any unoccupied seats being taken by flight crew (several sets required if crew are operating back-to-back) ?
British Airways Repatriation Flights from India: A real life experience
7 May 2020
at 14:57
AMcWhirterParticipantAnd how could you have social distancing on a flight like this ?
7 May 2020
at 15:17
SimonS1ParticipantI must say I agree with the comments from Willie Walsh in the media today. Social distancing will simply not work in airline travel. Masks or face coverings may provide some limited protection, but the only way of removing the risk is not to fly.
Honestly, anyone that seriously thinks the airports and airlines can manage around this is I’m afraid either a fool or completely deluded. Really – 1km long queues to board weaving through the airport? 30% of seats occupied? People not removing their masks at any point? Yeah, right. Maybe on 1st April next year.
13 users thanked author for this post.
7 May 2020
at 15:34
J_PathmoreParticipantCompletely agree with SimonS1. It’s amazing that given all the information out there people still believe sitting slightly further away on a plane will make the difference. It’s proven that if someone in an adjacent aisle of a grocery store coughs, you will likely be exposed. How on earth do you think this will play out when someone even ~5 rows behind you on a flight coughs…
Expecting airlines to fly at reduced capacity is also delusional… somewhat similar to the idea that restaurants in busy cities should operate with 25-50% capacity.
If you want to reduce the risk, don’t fly, or perhaps fly 1st class on a wide body where you have your own suite (but don’t forget the risks you’ll take getting to that suite).
7 May 2020
at 15:45
SimonS1Participant[quote quote=998406]or perhaps fly 1st class on a wide body where you have your own suite (but don’t forget the risks you’ll take getting to that suite).[/quote]
And don’t go to the bathroom. Or accept any food (you don’t know who has handled it). And take care at the boarding gate, plus security. And in the lounge (if they open it). Not to mention baggage reclaim (no priory baggage on BA!).
In fact good luck altogether.
3 users thanked author for this post.
7 May 2020
at 16:05
canuckladParticipantThis BA story, isn’t so much fake news as irrelevant news !!
And another example of a story that ……..BIG SIGH
I can’t talk for anybody else, but for me as an individual sitting here under house arrest (refuse to euphemise) my emotional and logical response swings between anger , and resignation to our plight.
But , as someone who used to be in control of his own destiny, and someone who loves travelling, loves socialising and generally loves life what frustrates most is the frustration I feel every time I realise and recognise that our leaders are behaving like I did when I was setting out as a teenager trying to conquer that scariest of all things …… Women !!
Fumbling , haplessly around in the dark , attempting to unlock something or another that would magically ease you magically on to something else, that you weren’t quite sure of , but knowing it would probably be worth it !!
And mostly credit to WW, we actually need the leaders of all our industries to start to shout louder and put the pragmatic, realistic future to our leaders.
2 users thanked author for this post.
8 May 2020
at 09:42
FaroFlyerParticipantTo go back to the original thread about social distancing on flights this is what the Portuguese Government has decreed:
”
Air transport: Passenger air transport will see a reduction to two-thirds of the capacity of planes, although the Government has cautioned several exceptions.
Exceptions include specific repatriation flights; commercial flights of air carriers, national or foreign, that “are used to carry out repatriation actions or that justifiably serve this purpose””8 May 2020
at 10:32
SimonS1Participant[quote quote=998434]Air transport: Passenger air transport will see a reduction to two-thirds of the capacity of planes,[/quote]
Can’t see how that will work. Take out the middle seat (so roughly a third) and you will still be well within 2 meters of the person in front, behind, across the aisle.
Really such measures are just pandering to the “something must be done” brigade….
2 users thanked author for this post.
8 May 2020
at 10:48
DavidSmith2ParticipantI can’t speak for Nigeria, but certainly in Ghana the High Commission has a list of all Brits who have registered with them and is keeping them well informed by email, as well as posting on social media. We have a flight going out later today from Accra, which is fully subscribed. But I know they hope to do more, as there are still quite a lot of people who would like to return home. Same price arrangement as for Nigeria by the look of it.
8 May 2020
at 11:02 -
AuthorPosts