Leonard Lawrence (Former British Aerospace BAe146 and Boeing 757/767 Pilot)
Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study) Basel Switzerland Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220).
Len Lawrence. His storey was one of costly legal battles to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that he was not mentally unfit. What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacks knowledge of the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance to take those culpable.
United Kingdom Hospital Medical Director
Report Leonard Lawrence
Mr Lawrence has been heavily exposed to organophosphates. He was medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity. During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3’s) had been obtained but not registered with the Court of Protection. He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of Protection. During this time considerable amounts of his assets went missing.
United Kingdom Consultant Haematologist
Dear Mr Lawrence I am sorry that we will not be able to accept you as a donor. This is because of your history of organophosphate poisoning that has left you with on-going nervous system problems.
United Kingdom Professor and Consultant Immunologist
Clearly Mr Lawrence has been through a great deal because of his organophosphate poisoning and related matters.
Professor Abou-Donia Professor of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and of Neurobiology
(Testing paid for by the British Airline Pilots Association)
Tau and MBP suggest the presence of moderate brain injury. Consistent with chemical-induced nervous system injury.
Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Malcolm Hooper
Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215)
In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care