You are here: Discussion »  All airlines » 

Welcome Guest, sign in or register here.


SN Brussels? Let's go back to Sabena


1 2  Next »


Posts

Tom0706 - 06/01/2012 03:21 GMT

With SN Brussels reintroducing flights to New York and an upgrade of their business and economy classes, I think it's time the airline returned to its original name, Sabena.

I'm sure there were legal reasons for why the company had to change its name, but at the end of the day the brand "SN Brussels" lacks meaning whereas Sabena (Société Autonyme Belge d'Exploitation de la Navigation Aérienne) is a brand with heritage and character!

Just my 2 cents,
Tom


janrotterdam - 06/01/2012 06:31 GMT

Tom - I would not recommend to go back to naming the company Sabena. First of all the new name is well known now and has a good repurtation...whereas the repuration of the former Sabena (Such A Bad Experience Never Again) was lacking............I often travel SN Brussels Airlines and now that they joined Miles & More what else is there to want......


dutchyankee - 06/01/2012 07:59 GMT

I have to agree with Jan, I live in both Belgium and Holland, and can only say that I have extremely negative feelings whenever I hear the name Sabena. It reminds me of all that is bad with a government owned, mismanaged, entitled carrier, with pathetically lazy staff providing horrendous service, There is a reason that in Sabena's entire 70+ year history it had only one profitable year, and that was the first year of it being owned by Swissair. Let the Sabena name rest in peace, and let's keep SN Brussels who, while I don't fly them often, what I have experienced of them is much better than I ever had with their predecessor.


DisgustedofSwieqi - 06/01/2012 08:11 GMT

Sad And Bad Evil Nasty Airline, as one of my ex colleagues used to refer to it.

PS. Jan Rotterdam's is much more elegant than the above.


dutchyankee - 06/01/2012 08:23 GMT

I think yours is pretty elegant too!! Love it


LuganoPirate - 07/01/2012 06:07 GMT

When I lived in Rotterdam I used to fly Sabena on routes that KLM or Swissair did not fly to. I only had negative experiences with them. On one occasion leaving Jeddah, with 100 thirsty oil workers on board, they announced they had forgotten to load the alcohol at Brussels. What they did have was drunk on the way down and they were now dry. A riot nearly broke out.

To top it all, they showed some aircraft disaster movie just to get everyone in the right mood!

The buying of Sabena by Swissair was one reason for their downfall. What a mistake that was. I think it was a few days after 9/11, with the industry in its worse state of crisis ever, that the pilots decided to go on strike. Unbelievable!

I think Dutchyankee you used the wrong word for "B". I seem to recall a certain 6 letter word ending in "Y"!


Biggless - 26/01/2012 12:41 GMT

This question raises for me a different question to just the name - why is it that hard working tax payers are forced by crazy governments to subsidise loss making airlines ? Sabena should have gone bust many yrs ago but was kept going by the Belgium tax payer. Likewise AirFrance should be allowed to die but sadly Neil Kinnock as European transport minister allowed special permission to break EU subsidy rules and allowed the French government to keep them going. Imagine if all the loss making airlines went bust, we would have wonderful quiet airports. Yes it would mean the end of the silly low prices but they are not sustainable as proven by the fact that many airlines make a loss. It would also be better for the environment if there was less flying.


LuganoPirate - 26/01/2012 12:46 GMT

The French would keep AF going permission or not. To much pride at stake and can you imagine a French Ambassador flying from say Washington to Paris via London with BA?

By the way, I hear rumours Swiss will revert to Swissair in a few years. Anyone heard the same?


TiredOldHack - 26/01/2012 13:07 GMT

@LagunoPirate - yes, that was my recollection of the SABENA acronym as well....

The disappearance of Sabena managed to elevate Iberia to the title of Europe's Worst Flag Carrying Airline, in my opinion.


Tom0706 - 26/01/2012 14:15 GMT

I don't think it's that hard to come up with puns for an acronym or a brand name (SkyTeam = ScareTeam, United = Untied) ... at the end of the day, No airline in this world is universally lauded by everyone that has ever flown them.

With that said, I'm not a Belgian myself... but I would have trouble swallowing the idea that the name of my country's flag carrier is "Brussels Airlines" -- It just doesn't sound sophisticated and it lacks the story of a 70+ year old airline that pioneered routes to Africa and had a fleet of over 80 aircraft.

Let me stress again that when I say the name should come back, I don't mean all of the "baggage" that comes with it -- rebranding the company wouldn't suddenly make all of the positive aspects of Brussels Airlines disappear.

@TiredOldHack
I have no idea what would make you say Iberia is Europe's worst flag carrier... I don't know that much about the airline except that they were able to squeeze out profits in difficult times back in the early 2000s and introduced (angled, sadly) lie-flat business class seats long before Alitalia, nor did they cease to operate like Olympic Airways did.

@janrottterdam
Rebranding the company back to the name that gives the airline proper recognition as Belgium's flag carrier would not impact its membership in Miles & More

Cheers,
Tom


TiredOldHack - 26/01/2012 15:13 GMT

Iberia was the last of the old dinosaur state-managed airlines, and it showed in their customer service. They might have improved since, but my memory, four or five years ago, of one of their flioghts being 100% (yes, one hundred per cent) over-booked means I won't fly with them again if I can possibly help it.


nathanBAGOLD - 26/01/2012 22:30 GMT

Sabena all the way. bring back the old S logo and do a nice new livery !


salguod - 27/01/2012 02:06 GMT

I have never flown Sabena but my experience with Brussels Airways was anything but pleasant. The aircraft was dirty and the Cabin Attendant was not very friendly (I was flying in the equivalent of business). This same cabin attendant shouted over the PA system for every one to shut up and keep quiet very rudely and then proceeded to announce "On behalf of Brussels Airways, we warmly welcome you on this flight to Brussels....." So the use of SABENA (ie Such A Bad Experience Never Again) may actually be quite appropriate!


Tom0706 - 27/01/2012 03:52 GMT

As I mentioned earlier, there's no airline out there that can say it has pleased every passenger to have ever flown with them. From lost luggage to rude flight attendants to people who recline their seat all the way... flying isn't what it used to be.

@nathanBAGOLD
Thank you! Finally someone is with me on this. When Delta, United, AA etc. filed for bankruptcy, they didn't change their name... in the end people will see these airilnes' respective financial meltdowns as tiny "speedbumps" in what are otherwise storied and rich histories.

Swiss, Lufthansa, TAP, Thai, Singapore, AF, BA, SAA, etc... these airlines are like "world ambassadors" representing their country wherever they fly -- Brussels Airlines sounds like a regional startup carrier. FlyBaboo, anyone? (great airline, btw!)

Honestly, Lufthansa may as well save their money and create efficiencies by folding Brussels Airlines into the LH fleet and network.


DisgustedofSwieqi - 27/01/2012 05:59 GMT

Tom

Let me draw you a picture to explain why the grizzled old travellers on here have a negative reaction to the name Sabena.

Sabena was cr*p, rubbish, unpleasant, unreliable, arrogant, inefficient, didn't give a sh*t etc... Along with the Norwegian Blue parrot, it has gone to a better place.

Let's face it, Brussels attracts a very big income stream to Belgium, NATO, EC and the associated organizations etc.

So, IMHO, it is entirely appropriate that the airline of Belgium is named Brussels Airlines, as without all this income stream, Belgium would be absolutely b*ggered.


dutchyankee - 27/01/2012 07:24 GMT

@DoS, 100% with you on this. I live in Flanders and in Holland, and can tell you, quite frankly, Belgium is pretty b*ggered even with the EU and NATO business coming in, as the nations represented do not pay any taxes to the Belgium government. Sure a number of companies want to base themselves here to be close to the 'action' or should I say 'in-action,' but with the social costs rising, personal taxes being the second highest in Europe, Belgium is certainly not a poster child for prosperity. Sabena was a prime case in point. In over 70 years of history Sabena had only one profitable year, and that was when Swissair owned it. It was a complete parastatal, flying the flag to destinations simply for that reason, most of their long haul routes (with the exception of Africa) were completely unsustainable, and yet pride and the government forced them to continue. Sabena stood for Société Autonyme Belge d'Exploitation de la Navigation Aérienne (Belgian company for exploiting aerial navigation), and that name should now RIP. Whilst Brussels Airlines is not great, and the name is not exactly original, it certainly 'does what it says on the tin', so to speak!


LPPSKrisflyer - 27/01/2012 08:07 GMT

If it needs a new name how about Air Belgium or Belgian Airlines? Brussels Airlines is very parochial. OTOH, Lufthansa could just rename the whole operation European World Airways!


TiredOldHack - 27/01/2012 09:03 GMT

"Lufthansa could just rename the whole operation European World Airways"

and bring a few Junkers 52s out of retirement.


LuganoPirate - 27/01/2012 09:40 GMT

That made me laugh Tired! Can you imagine the faces of the waiting line of pinstripes mingling with the great unwashed as they prepare to board the Iron Annie's ;-)


TiredOldHack - 27/01/2012 11:57 GMT

I only mention the Tante Ju because I watched one on finals for Koln/Bonn from a train window, a few years ago. I was in Koln for the ANUGA food fair and was on my way back to my hotel in nearby Konigswinter. The line runs close to the airport.

Anyway, I was enthralled because I'd never seen a 52 in the air before, and the train was absolutely keeping pace with it (or vice versa...) for a few minutes and we weren't going fast. I later Googled the landing speed of the 52, and discovered it was something like 55 knots! Take-off speed wasn't much more, either.

Anyway, next day I was back at the show and bumped into a contact who I knew was an old classic transport freak, as I am, and mentioned this. His eyes lit up. Apparently they have a small flight of Ju52s on the Lufthansa strength and they do joy-rides and small local flights with them. The pilots are all LH Boeing 747 pilots and they fight for the chance to fly the old Tante Jus, because they love them.

"I bought my father a flight for his birthday last year," he beamed. "It was only about 120 euros. He had not been in a Ju52 for many years."

"Oh, when was the last time?"

"When he jumped out of one into Norway in 1940."

Splendid stuff.



1 2  Next »




TOP SECTIONS »

Cut the cost of... communication

Cut the cost of... communication

Business Traveller offers tried-and-tested tips on getting more for your money. This month: communication
Read more »

In the picture

In the picture

Stats presented in illuminating ways. This month: BRIC flights from Europe
Read more »

Ten top global rail links

Ten top global rail links

Tired of flying? Let the train take the strain. Alex McWhirter suggests ten trips linking major cities
Read more »