BA Gatwick Strategy and the Regions
Back to Forum- This topic has 6 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 29 May 2016
at 10:18 by canucklad.
-
- Author
- Posts
- Skip to last reply Create Topic
-
Tony-UKParticipantThis has probably been debated ad nauseum already but I am puzzled why BA is happy to haemorrhage regional customers to it’s competitors? I raise again as BA are introducing new and interesting routes from Gatwick e.g. Lima, Cape Town and Costa Rica (in addition to the many other European destinations)…
I should add that I am a regular BA customer but am using alternatives now for flights that depart from Gatwick as it is too much like hard work to get there. I have just booked a long-haul holiday from Gatwick as we got a good price from BA Holidays, but once I looked into how we are going to get to Gatwick I regretted it and wished I had gone for Emirates. We live near Manchester and the options are:
1) Fly Manchester to Heathrow, collect bags and heave them by bus across to Gatwick and check in again (still astonished BA have not provided a service to facilitate this transfer now that the Gatwick regional shuttles have gone).
2) Take a train to London Euston, and make our way across London to the train station for the Gatwick link.
3) Coach (very lengthy) to Gatwick from Manchester.
None of the above appeal so we are (reluctantly) driving to Gatwick, not something we really want to do but the option that will take the shortest time with least hassle.
I should add never again BA from Gatwick…
I am surprised that other airlines have not developed routes from the major regional airports to Gatwick (from Manchester I can fly to Aberdeen, Edinburgh, and Southampton…) but I guess space at Gatwick is expensive and limited.
I am flying to Mauritius next week and am going with Emirates, am looking forward to a chauffeur pickup, a great lounge experience at Manchester, Dubai and Mauritius, and a seamless transfer at Dubai airport, a no brainer…
28 May 2016
at 17:11
ViajeroUKParticipantMaybe the reason that there are a lack of options from UK regions to Gatwick is that airlines have concentrated on connections from the UK regions to offshore hubs with better onward flights than LGW, eg Amsterdam, CDG, Frankfurt, and also as you point out Dubai, Doha and Abu Dhabi.
28 May 2016
at 18:18
AMcWhirterParticipantExcept for Anglo-Scottish routes it appears flights from other regional airports are unprofitable.
Jet2 used to operate into LGW from LBA, MAN and NCL. All three routes failed.
Flybe operates NQY-LGW but only because it receives around £3 million in subsidies.
http://www.theguardian.com/travel/2014/oct/26/air-subsidy-newquay-gatwick
28 May 2016
at 18:38
TravellatorParticipantIAG/Aer Lingus relinquished their slots from BHD to LGW, so no connection to the new BA routes ex LGW only EZY from BFS so no interlining baggage – shot in the foot for IAG in my opinion.
28 May 2016
at 18:53
FDOS_UKParticipantTony-UK – 28/05/2016 18:11 BST
Time to accept that BA is really LSE Airways (London and South East) and beyond that limited geographic scope, you’ll be treated like a mug if you book with them.
Next time, book Emirates and save yourself the hassle.
I’m off the Paris for three days work, later today.
Options were
BA MAN-LHR-ORY (Orly is near the client, so a plus)
BE MAN-CDG
U2 LPL-CDGeasyJet was half the price of BA, 2/3 the price of Flybe and I’ll swallow the RER/tramway as less hassle than changing at Heathrow.
29 May 2016
at 08:30
canuckladParticipantAgree with a lot of what’s being said…..
And I can imagine BA top brass scratching their heads trying to figure out why new route long haul load factors are performing lower than predicted. Having said that, I can’t criticize BA too much, as they serve the 3 primary London airports very well from Edinburgh.
I’m more contemptuous of Virgins cynical slot sitting exercise with Little Red, making no real attempt at taking on BA.29 May 2016
at 10:18 -
AuthorPosts