Alex on… fixed business cabins return to Europe

Back to Forum
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 62 total)

  • Anonymous
    Guest

    I had thought that we would never again see a fixed business class cabin within Europe given what happened in the past.

    But now I’m not so sure.

    Around 20 years ago both Swissair and KLM launched dedicated business class cabins with proper wide seats across their European fleets.

    But the fixed cabin failed to cope with the peaks and troughs of European business class. At busy times, business class passengers might be downgraded or, worse still, denied a seat on board altogether.

    At times when leisure travellers outnumbered those on business some of the former might find themselves lucky enough to be upgraded.

    So after a few years both carriers reverted to the familiar flexible cabin layouts we see today.

    However I believe today’s marketplace has changed.

    What was impractical in the mid-1990s might be feasible today for the following reasons:

    • The big national airlines are rationalising their networks by hiving off their non-core routes

    • One reason why business class was popular in the 1990s was because the tariff structure was rigged to get people to book it. Today that’s no longer the case. As a result business class demand has slumped to more manageable levels so a dedicated cabin needn’t take up much space

    • Swiss Air and KLM said that one reason for offering proper seats was to reduce the ‘comfort gap’ when transferring from a long-haul to a short-haul premium cabin flight. But that was 20 years ago in the days when even first class didn’t provide as much space as today’s business class

    • Today’s long- to short-haul comfort gap is greater still thanks to flat beds in business and suites in first class

    • Airlines need a proper short-haul product to impress their top customers, especially those booking long-haul indirect flights.

    A few of you hinted in a previous blog that Lufthansa might lead the pack with a fixed cabin once its non-core routes have been handed over to Germanwings.

    So what do you think? Will a fixed cabin return anytime soon?

    Alex McWhirter


    Irons80
    Participant

    Hi Alex,

    I think this is a fascinating story – however, I still cannot see how BA, with so many routes and flying from different airports with different customers bases at each, would be able to manage this?

    They would either end up with 3 different types of CE, or else would lose the flexibility of right-sizing aircraft for different flights and times of the day. This is especially important as at LHR they operate 4 different types of short-haul aircraft and that doesn’t include domestic, which would then need a separate fleet, unless they put business class back on domestic routes.


    Henkel.Trocken
    Participant

    I think the short haul business class experience has to either improve or die. The current offering is a joke no matter who you fly with and the only thing you can say about it is that it’s better than they offer in Y.

    I’ve heard the LH story about a new cabin and goodness, they need to do something about the NEK seats. Mrs HT and I are travelling to ADB with them in a couple of weeks and I’m not looking forward to the experience which is at least in two parts with a change at MUC.

    The last couple of times I’ve been on LH short haul there have been a maximum of five people in C often spread over seven or eight rows.


    VintageKrug
    Participant

    As someone who actually uses shorthaul business class regularly for business rather than the many retirees and leisure travellers off with their other halves for weekend jaunts, I am very happy with the service offered on the ground (far better than that offered, for instance, in the USA on similar tickets) and also the offering in the air, including catering.

    Not everyone will agree with that, but it is my strong assertion that the flexible layouts work well for shorter European flights under two hours duration. Unless you’re obese, you simply don’t need extra space.

    The only possible criticisms would be variability of crew (being addressed with the introduction of performance management, albeit softly-softly to start with) and second the need for internet enabled aircraft (for data only!).

    Otherwise the pricepoints, frequencies, flight times, lounges, aircraft used and BAEC incentives keep me loyal. Any improvement towards a more luxurious but less efficient layouts would increase prices, and with travel budgets stretched, it wouldn’t take much for my all-business class policy to change to Y, which would lose money for the airlines long term.

    We have seen something of what Alex describes on midhaul routes with the switch to fixed seating in the A321s on flights in the 5+ hour range (Amman, Beirut) and some routes becoming longhaul configured (Moscow and one Iberia Madrid flight, for instance).

    I’d hope that Larnaca and Athens would become midhaul in due course, though unlikely with current events continuing to strangle growth in Southern Europe.

    I’m afraid I see it more along the lines of preserving the status quo on flights 1-3 hours, but perhaps reducing the cost of the economy cabin (with promotions such as no checked baggage fares) to better compete with LCCs, or the removal of a premium altogether on some shorter routes and the introduction of some fixed mid haul and longhaul configured cabins on certain flights, depending on timings.


    Henkel.Trocken
    Participant

    I’m not sure the airlines would be interested in why people use their C cabins, just that they do.

    Equally, the flexible layouts work well for the airlines but I suspect that most passengers are disappointed with the offering when you compare it for instance to Australia, South East Asia or North America. Europe lags behind.

    I wonder who is introducing performance management for cabin crew, AFAIK, LH, LX AF and KL have had it for years. Good that others are catching up.

    I don’t think we need to fear price increases, companies even in tighter times will stump up for those they value enough to travel in C and if the rest are consigned to Y I doubt we will miss them.

    I think the poster above must be referring solely to experience of BA. Fortunately we have a choice and if LH do introduce fixed C seating as is rumoured I’m sure there won’t be any trouble filling the cabin. Mrs HT is a little worried that award seats won’t be available but at the end of the day we’ll just pay if we want to go badly enough.


    ScottWilson
    Participant

    I think the issue is less the 2 hours or less point to point trips, but when these flights feed into long haul.

    Finnair has a great long haul business class product to Asia, but flying to Helsinki on its short haul business class is a disappointment when you may simply want to snooze, at either end of the trip.

    Same applies to all of the other European long haul carriers, LH/LX/OS, AF/KL and although I’m in London, a similar perception for BA.

    Of course FFs with status get priority checkin/baggage/security at some airports and lounge access anyway in Y. So what’s left but the seat and catering? The catering is reasonable, but few would argue that it is worth it just for that (and be cheaper for airlines to provide better food in lounges than offer it on board).

    The big issue is flexibility, but what is lost by having 4 rows of premium economy type seats (e.g. BA new WT+) in pairs either side of the aisle? Could add in free wifi (surely on board wifi has to come soon to legacy carriers to differentiate them from LCCs) for business class (paid in economy or free for elite FFs) and choice of hot meals.

    Then the existing product could also be offered for sale to a few, to see if they still care for a meal and an empty middle seat?


    BeckyBoop
    Participant

    BA offers full F and C service with fully flat beds on the London to Moscow route serviced by a 747.


    LeTigre
    Participant

    I agree with Alex too, the market could support a fixed business cabin.

    In Asia, regional business class varies from premium economy to full lie flats though the flights are obviously longer. However, I don’t think it unrealistic to expect one of the airlines to fit a premium economy type seat to the narrow body aircraft for European flights. Something along the lines of what CX announced recently would be particularly well received.


    sparkyflier
    Participant

    This is an interesting topic but something that will be difficult for the airlines logistically.

    I actually like Club Europe and its offering. The lounges are great and I think the seating and personal space on the aircraft is reasonable- 34″ pitch is decent. Catering seems to have improved slightly. However, some of the seats are really battered, and it is odd boarding a brand new factory fresh A319 and then sitting on seats no doubt used before on the 757 fleet!

    But this is not a discussion about the BA product, but all European products, and for a 3 hour plus flight, this kind of seating is not so attractive. Arguably fixed seating is already coming in, BB mentioned BA and Moscow, well Turkish have their long haul product on some LHR & CDG flights, but the 737-800 I was on last year had 2 x 2 big seats (but not lie-flat) on a IST-LHR flight.

    The benefit of the current products around Europe is flexibility. I suspect this will stay, except for specific routes where there is loads of demand for a premium product, and a predictable number of PAX.

    AF I flew C a short while back within Europe, which was decent (although catering rather poor) but would I really want this product on a Levant or Yerevan route? Not really. A few years ago I flew ATH-LHR on a BA767 in a CE seat – very numb bum by the end of that.

    I think 3 hours or more is where a superior product is needed.


    Binman62
    Participant

    If airlines do move to a fixed cabin, I for one would welcome that.
    Business class in Europe is lamentable on almost every possible level and you would need to be desperate to pay the sort of fares demanded for the service and product provided. This is particularly true if departing from t3 and the bus ride around the building site) No matter which carrier you choose if you are availing yourself of the £49 or £69 upgrade offers, then business may be attractive, but to pay in excess of £400 to fly to FRA is bonkers.
    Compare the service in Europe with that delivered in Asia and offerings by MH CX SQ et al for flight up to 3 and 4 hours. These flights are packed and the yields on point to point excelent.


    VintageKrug
    Participant

    Business Classes in Europe are far from lamentable, when compared to alternatives in other countries, and particularly at the price points at which they are offered.

    Those of us who actually do travel for business, rather than the motley crew of retired armchair CEOs, find the frequencies, timings and facilities on the ground and in the air more than adequate to get a good day’s work in whichever European hellhole we need to get to before its currency collapses.

    Airlines take very special care to understand their customer segmentation – probably more than most industries.

    They could not be more interested in why customers use their premium cabins.

    A fixed cabin on most shorthaul routes would massively increase cost, reduce flexibility of fleet and flexibility for individual flights and drive up cost, pricing many businesses and most leisure passengers out of the market (and end to the £69 upgrade) leading to the ultimate demise of premium offerings on shorthaul.


    Irons80
    Participant

    Here I would have to agree with VintageKrug, It just doesn’t seem possible to get around the flexibility issue for airlines such as BA / LH / AF.

    And comparing Asia and N.America doesn’t seem right – it’s apples with pears, not apples with apples.

    Asian airlines tend to use long-haul widebodied aircraft across their fleets and therefore they are used on both short and longer flights. To some extent this could be argued as also exercising flexibility in an inverse way – they also want to keep fleets rationalised in order to use the same aircraft across as wide a route portfolio as possible. And many have opened LCCs to enable shorthaul aircraft to enter their fleets.

    In NA, it is the biggest air network in the world (still – I believe I read that somewhere) and so the numbers of flights and aircrafts and hubs that each airline offers allows them be able to have fleets just dedicated to one or two routes or hubs alone, e.g. NYC-LAX / SFO


    JohnHarper
    Participant

    Business class on European carriers is a disgrace for the money paid. The pricing compared to SE Asia, Australia or North America is in the main higher. Compare the price of C from SIN-BKK with LHR-FCO, journeys of similar length and you will find the former is cheaper and the product far superior.

    I really don’t think we as passengers should be worrying about the problems a fixed cabin would have for airlines. It’s their job to deliver a good product at a reasonable price and IMO they are failing to do that at the moment.

    There is no reason why a fixed cabin should increase costs, it doesn’t on long haul where they use upgrades and downgrades to get around cabin size, the same would apply to short haul where upgrades have happened for years and on occasions whole cabin downgrades when the middle seat has been filled.

    Selling upgrades rather than giving them away is proving quite lucrative I understand so the seats may generate a decent income that way too. Turkish seem to be making good money from their offering.

    LH need to do something with their NEK seats. The differentiation of the product to and from FRA and MUC suggests that they have plans. If they, as Europe’s largest carrier decide to go ahead there will be little choice for others but to follow or kill off C all together on short haul.


    Irons80
    Participant

    @JohnHarper – I for one am not ‘worried’ about the problems it would have for airlines – I am just realistic about the European aviation business environment and cannot see how anything will change.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 62 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
The cover of the Business Traveller April 2024 edition
The cover of the Business Traveller April 2024 edition
Be up-to-date
Magazine Subscription
To see our latest subscription offers for Business Traveller editions worldwide, click on the Subscribe & Save link below
Polls